A Federal High Court in Lagos has slated August
13, 2015 for judgment in a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by former
Deputy Governor of Ondo State, Alhaji Ali Olanusi, to challenge his
impeachment.
Olanusi, who was impeached on April 27, 2015, had
sued the IG and the chairman of the seven-man investigative panel which found
him guilty of impeachable offences, Mr. Olatunji Adeniyan.
Justice Mohammed Idris adjourned for judgment on
Monday after taking arguments from the parties.
Olanusi was represented by his lawyer, Mr.
Olukoya Ogungbeje, while the Attorney General of Ondo State, Mr. Eyitayo Jegede
(SAN), represented Adeniyan, who was sued as the first respondent.
In his suit, which was transferred from the Akure
Division of the Federal High Court to the Lagos Division, so that it could be
urgently heard, Olanusi is contending that the Adeniyan-led panel breached his
fundamental right to fair hearing.
His lawyer, Ogungbeje, claimed that “the sitting,
conclusion of proceedings and submission of report by the panel within one day”
denied Olanusi his right to fair hearing as enshrined in Section 36 of the 1999
Constitution.
Olanusi claimed that the impeachment panel did
not give him adequate time and facility to defend himself against the
allegations of misconduct which he was found guilty of.
He also alleged that the Adeniyan-led panel
failed to personally serve him with the notice of the allegation of misconduct
before proceeding into hearing and reaching its verdict.
He therefore sought an order quashing the
proceedings and the report of the Adeniyan-led seven-man impeachment panel which
recommended him for impeachment.
He also sought an order nullifying his removal as
the Ondo State Deputy Governor by the state House of Assembly on April 27,
2015.
But in a preliminary objection brought before
Justice Idris on Monday through Jegede, Adeniyan urged the court to
discountenance Olanusi and strike out his suit.
Jegede, who described Olanusi’s suit as an abuse
of court processes, said the ex-deputy governor goofed by approaching the court
through a fundamental right enforcement application to challenge his
impeachment.
Pointing out that Olanusi’s application was not
filed in compliance with Order X Rule 1 of the fundamental rights enforcement
procedure 2009, Jegede said the suit was defective and urged the court to strike
it out.
Besides, the Attorney General challenged the
jurisdiction of the court to hear the case, arguing that the subject matter was
not what the Federal High Court could assume jurisdiction.
No comments:
Post a Comment